The same ‘feminists’, whose guiding principle appears to be ‘my body, my choice’, abandon that principle when it really becomes relevant - in the promotion of the forcible injection of drugs into everyone including children & pregnant women.
This is proof that their stance on abortion has nothing to do with ‘rights’.
Women actually have the right to use contraception and/or not have sex and get pregnant..
I'm shocked at how Abortion is used to get rid of something that they are at least half responsible for happening and as if it is like, "I bought the wrong coloured skirt, can I return it please?'. I don't know anything about the number of women that have second, third etc., abortions!!???
We don’t need to reestablish fault divorce in order for judges to enforce the constitutional right to be a parent. The no-fault laws did not prohibit judges from following the constitutional right to be a parent. Judges create and perpetuate litigation with unequal custody orders. In other words, judges are the problem.
We need to modernize all courts. All courtrooms should be viewable online. We need to bring them out of the dark ages with 21st century technology. We’re supposed to have public courtrooms. The number of people witnessing a trial, must not be limited by the size of any courtroom. Judges do their dirty work in the dark, ie., in secret courts. And no parent should lose custody rights unless tried and convicted in criminal court, for a crime such as child abuse, neglect or abandonment.
As it is, family court judges act under color of law, following unconstitutional statutes that purport to give them authority to determine custody. They need to be tried under US Code 18 section 242, Deprivation of rights under color of law, every time they deny a fit parent his or her right to be a parent. See http://exiledparents.org/
This is all true, and judges were starting to do this even before the no-fault laws. But no-fault laws codified and legitimized what judges were doing and encouraged them to do it more, which they have done since 1969. It has also helped spread the corruption to the rest of the judiciary. A campaign against no-fault would be a way of bringing all this out into the open and provide a rallying point to push for what you suggest. There is already widespread support for it, so it is the most likely way to get this started. There is no way the judiciary is going to take the initiative to put crooked judges on trial.
Abortion is important because it is weaponized as a "means to an end". Despite that pregnancies don't happen, among humans, with men, feminists hold women's role as dominant. The intent is to "flex" muscle to the pursuit of being the dominant gender and, eventually, bring about matriarchal rule.
The trick is to hold women to the exact same standards men are held too. And to expose feminists support for abortion as the murder of a child in their mother's womb. As well as publicly shaming them and the women who follow them.
Abortion is a ritual human sacrifice to Baphomet, who is the god of the powerful "elites".
What can I say but, 'interesting'.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baphomet
evil..otherwise...
The same ‘feminists’, whose guiding principle appears to be ‘my body, my choice’, abandon that principle when it really becomes relevant - in the promotion of the forcible injection of drugs into everyone including children & pregnant women.
This is proof that their stance on abortion has nothing to do with ‘rights’.
Yes...
Women actually have the right to use contraception and/or not have sex and get pregnant..
I'm shocked at how Abortion is used to get rid of something that they are at least half responsible for happening and as if it is like, "I bought the wrong coloured skirt, can I return it please?'. I don't know anything about the number of women that have second, third etc., abortions!!???
What a weird world it has become... I'm shocked.
We don’t need to reestablish fault divorce in order for judges to enforce the constitutional right to be a parent. The no-fault laws did not prohibit judges from following the constitutional right to be a parent. Judges create and perpetuate litigation with unequal custody orders. In other words, judges are the problem.
We need to modernize all courts. All courtrooms should be viewable online. We need to bring them out of the dark ages with 21st century technology. We’re supposed to have public courtrooms. The number of people witnessing a trial, must not be limited by the size of any courtroom. Judges do their dirty work in the dark, ie., in secret courts. And no parent should lose custody rights unless tried and convicted in criminal court, for a crime such as child abuse, neglect or abandonment.
As it is, family court judges act under color of law, following unconstitutional statutes that purport to give them authority to determine custody. They need to be tried under US Code 18 section 242, Deprivation of rights under color of law, every time they deny a fit parent his or her right to be a parent. See http://exiledparents.org/
This is all true, and judges were starting to do this even before the no-fault laws. But no-fault laws codified and legitimized what judges were doing and encouraged them to do it more, which they have done since 1969. It has also helped spread the corruption to the rest of the judiciary. A campaign against no-fault would be a way of bringing all this out into the open and provide a rallying point to push for what you suggest. There is already widespread support for it, so it is the most likely way to get this started. There is no way the judiciary is going to take the initiative to put crooked judges on trial.
https://corpuslegalis.com/us/code/title18/deprivation-of-rights-under-color-of-law
Abortion is important because it is weaponized as a "means to an end". Despite that pregnancies don't happen, among humans, with men, feminists hold women's role as dominant. The intent is to "flex" muscle to the pursuit of being the dominant gender and, eventually, bring about matriarchal rule.
The trick is to hold women to the exact same standards men are held too. And to expose feminists support for abortion as the murder of a child in their mother's womb. As well as publicly shaming them and the women who follow them.