You are correct! Men have an inborn desire to protest women and see them as victims. Now that our society has put their thumb on the scale, the balance of female/male power is skewed in a pathological way. The result is that men are dominated and made 2nd class.
I read it fine in American Thinker, without an account.
This was a great insight....
----------------
This becomes clear by glancing at the constituency of “Kamala.” The very fact that everyone resists glancing confirms that we are terrified of an elephant in the room. Quite simply, she appeals to adolescent girls, including superannuated adolescent girls: fans of Taylor Swift and their elders who have grown into J.D. Vance’s “childless cat women.” What should disquiet all of us is not that Swift endorsed Kamala, but that such a fuss is being made about it and so many consider it important. Such voters do not worry overmuch about police-state methods and violated constitutional rights or millions of deaths from lethal “vaccines” and needless wars, so long as they can feel “joy.”
----------------
But, these people DO HAVE "morals" and a "just cause"....
In concerts in Melbourne and the UK which I know of, and possibly others, Taylor Swift got her crowd chanting "F... the Patriarchy! F... the patriarch!.."
Also, one of Taylor's hits was a song titled "The man" where she sang of how much better her life would have been if she'd been born male!
Endless war on men - their own fathers, brothers, and even sons (for the perpetual "adolescent") is their cause - and feels just great! And, yes, this is Kamala's constituency, along with the liberal men - who similarly are dedicated to the one great "cause" - war on other men.
You are correct! Men have an inborn desire to protest women and see them as victims. Now that our society has put their thumb on the scale, the balance of female/male power is skewed in a pathological way. The result is that men are dominated and made 2nd class.
I read it fine in American Thinker, without an account.
This was a great insight....
----------------
This becomes clear by glancing at the constituency of “Kamala.” The very fact that everyone resists glancing confirms that we are terrified of an elephant in the room. Quite simply, she appeals to adolescent girls, including superannuated adolescent girls: fans of Taylor Swift and their elders who have grown into J.D. Vance’s “childless cat women.” What should disquiet all of us is not that Swift endorsed Kamala, but that such a fuss is being made about it and so many consider it important. Such voters do not worry overmuch about police-state methods and violated constitutional rights or millions of deaths from lethal “vaccines” and needless wars, so long as they can feel “joy.”
----------------
But, these people DO HAVE "morals" and a "just cause"....
In concerts in Melbourne and the UK which I know of, and possibly others, Taylor Swift got her crowd chanting "F... the Patriarchy! F... the patriarch!.."
Also, one of Taylor's hits was a song titled "The man" where she sang of how much better her life would have been if she'd been born male!
Endless war on men - their own fathers, brothers, and even sons (for the perpetual "adolescent") is their cause - and feels just great! And, yes, this is Kamala's constituency, along with the liberal men - who similarly are dedicated to the one great "cause" - war on other men.