I hold a very low lever political position. Recently a topic arose where I took a stand on behalf of the father-child relationship. Predictably, the arrows started flying towards me, all coming from various women. Sadly, every man in the room more or less crawled under the table and sucked on their thumb while I took all the arrows alone…
I hold a very low lever political position. Recently a topic arose where I took a stand on behalf of the father-child relationship. Predictably, the arrows started flying towards me, all coming from various women. Sadly, every man in the room more or less crawled under the table and sucked on their thumb while I took all the arrows alone. Not one "man" would dare take a stand on behalf of the father-child relationship. Not one "man" would dare face the angered women.
Nobody in any official (govt. media, corporations, NGOs etc.) will touch the issue that is destroying our nation at lightspeed: total feminism, the degradation and disenfranchisement of boys and men, mass fatherlessness, so forth. To do so is to expose oneself to the Monstrous Horde of women and the simp-boys that coat-tail the fembots. Like Cucker Tarlson, way too much to lose.
On men's part, it is a failure of courage. Plain old sacklessness. On women's part, it's just total failure of being human.
>> . Not one "man" would dare face the angered women.
The people in that room see misandry all the time. They know how it will endanger their sons in the workplace, marriage and just everyday life. Yet the women want “more” and the men are silent, out of fear (which I understand).
Good on you for taking a stand - and for telling us about it!
I hold a very low lever political position. Recently a topic arose where I took a stand on behalf of the father-child relationship. Predictably, the arrows started flying towards me, all coming from various women. Sadly, every man in the room more or less crawled under the table and sucked on their thumb while I took all the arrows alone. Not one "man" would dare take a stand on behalf of the father-child relationship. Not one "man" would dare face the angered women.
I fear this explains a lot. There is no substitute for courage. In men today, moral courage is far more deficient than physical.
Nobody in any official (govt. media, corporations, NGOs etc.) will touch the issue that is destroying our nation at lightspeed: total feminism, the degradation and disenfranchisement of boys and men, mass fatherlessness, so forth. To do so is to expose oneself to the Monstrous Horde of women and the simp-boys that coat-tail the fembots. Like Cucker Tarlson, way too much to lose.
On men's part, it is a failure of courage. Plain old sacklessness. On women's part, it's just total failure of being human.
>> . Not one "man" would dare face the angered women.
The people in that room see misandry all the time. They know how it will endanger their sons in the workplace, marriage and just everyday life. Yet the women want “more” and the men are silent, out of fear (which I understand).
Good on you for taking a stand - and for telling us about it!
Thank you, Stephen. You ain't so shabby yourself. I understand fear, too. But I don't let it stop me.
I have been doing this a long time, and I will continue to persist just as long as it takes.